Understanding cost effectiveness in neurology.

The USA spends more in healthcare per capita than any other country in the world, but ranks last among high-income industrialized nations in major markers of healthcare effectiveness such as life expectancy, maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, and infant mortality. Unlike other high-income industrialized nations, the USA does not have a national agency that systematically evaluates the cost-effectiveness of health care interventions and negotiates their price accordingly. This manuscript aims to introduce the rationale, terminology, advantages, and limitations of cost-effectiveness analysis. Cost-effectiveness analysis compares health interventions and evaluates their incremental value and their incremental cost compared with already existing healthcare interventions. Cost-effectiveness analysis integrates the best available evidence with patients' preferences to inform clinical decision making. Patients with neurological conditions are facing increasing challenges to access healthcare and prescription drugs. Cost-effectiveness analysis may help improve access to the most effective healthcare interventions and prescription drugs while containing healthcare costs.

If the Patient Does Not Take the Medication, It Will Not Work.

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL COMORBIDITIES: AN UNWANTED EFFECT OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS IN CHILDREN: Adriana Ulate-Campos, Iván Sánchez Fernández Seminars in Pediatric Neurology Volume 24, Issue 4, November 2017, Pages 320-330 Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders and, despite optimally chosen and dosed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), approximately 20%-30% of patients will continue to have seizures. Behavior and cognition are negatively impacted by seizures, but AEDs are also a major contributor to behavioral and cognitive deficits. However, the cognitive and behavioral effect of AEDs in children is insufficiently emphasized in the literature. This review summarizes the cognitive and behavioral effects of AEDs in the pediatric population with the objective of helping pediatricians and pediatric neurologists to select the AEDs with the best profile for their individual patient's needs.

Evolution of antiseizure medication use and cost in the United States of America 2006-2021.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution in use and cost of antiseizure medications (ASM) in the United States of America (USA). METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database (data of privately-insured patients) for the years 2006 to 2021. We identified patients with epilepsy who were on ASM. We adjusted cost for inflation with the Gross Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator. RESULTS: We evaluated 347,158 patients (46.9 % males; median (p25-p75) age: 33 (17-49) years; 28 % with pediatric-onset epilepsy and 72 % with adult-onset epilepsy) with a total of 1,385,382 person-years and 588,285,065 ASM prescription days. The most commonly prescribed (as percentage of prescription days) ASMs in 2006 were valproate (18 %) and lamotrigine (17 %) in pediatric-onset epilepsy and phenytoin (21 %) and carbamazepine (17 %) in adult-onset epilepsy, but starting in the 2010s, levetiracetam and lamotrigine became the most commonly prescribed ASMs in both pediatric-onset (in 2021, levetiracetam 25 %, lamotrigine 16 %) and adult-onset (in 2021, levetiracetam 27 %, lamotrigine 20 %) epilepsy. The proportion of generic ASM use increased 3.6-fold: from 23 % of prescription days in 2006 to 83 % of prescription days in 2021. The median (p25-p75) average wholesale price (AWP) per person-year increased by 102 % from $2,684 ($990-$5,509) in 2006 to $5,417 ($2,858-$12,310) in 2021. The increases were greater in absolute terms for brand-name ASMs by 419 %: $3,109 ($1,564-$5,068 in 2006 and $16,149 ($12,950-$23,377) in 2021 than for generic ASMs by 462 %: $699 ($457-$1,678) in 2006 and $3,931 ($2,618-$6,081) in 2021. The costs directly borne by the patient (copay, coinsurance, deductibles, and pharmacy processing fees) increased by 69 % for brand-name ASMs from $393 ($246-$570) in 2006 to $665 ($335-$1,308) in 2021, but decreased by 37 % for generic ASMs from $147 ($98-$213) in 2006 to $92 ($51-$141) in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The median cost of ASMs per person-year approximately doubled from 2006 to 2021. The increase in use of generic ASMs probably helped buffer the growing costs of ASMs. However, generic ASMs already represent 83 % of prescription days in 2021, with limited room to further contain costs by just increasing the proportion of generics.

Pediatric status epilepticus management by Emergency Medical Services (the pSERG cohort).

PURPOSE: Delayed treatment in status epilepticus (SE) is independently associated with increased treatment resistance, morbidity, and mortality. We describe the prehospital management pathway and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) timeliness in children who developed refractory convulsive status epilepticus (RCSE). METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study in the United States using prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020. We selected pediatric patients (one month-21 years) with RCSE initiated outside the hospital and transported to the hospital by EMS. RESULTS: We included 91 patients with a median (percentile25-percentile75) age of 3.0 (1.5-7.3) years. The median time from seizure onset to hospital arrival was 45 (30-67) minutes, with a median time cared for by EMS of 24 (15-36) minutes. Considering treatment by caregivers and EMS before hospital arrival, 20 (22%) patients did not receive any anti-seizure medications (ASM) and 71 (78%) received one to five doses of benzodiazepines (BZD), without non-BZD ASM. We provided the prehospital treatment flow path of these patients through caregivers and EMS including relevant time points. Patients with a history of SE were more likely to receive the first BZD in the prehospital setting compared to patients without a history of SE (adjusted HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.72-6.12, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study of pediatric RCSE, prehospital treatment may be streamlined further. Patients with a history of SE were more likely to receive prehospital rescue medication.

Temporal trends in the cost and use of first-line treatments for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the temporal trends in the cost and use of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), oral prednisolone, and vigabatrin, the first-line treatments for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). METHODS: Retrospective observational study using the MarketScan Commercial database from 2006 to 2020. We identified patients with IESS diagnosed between birth and 18 months of age who received at least one of the first-line treatments within 60 days of diagnosis. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the Gross Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator. RESULTS: A total of 1131 patients received at least one first-line treatment (median [p25 -p75 ] age: 6.3 [4.5-8.3] months, 55% male), of whom 592 patients received ACTH, 363 patients received oral prednisolone, and 355 patients received vigabatrin. After adjusting for inflation, the median average wholesale price of a 14-day course of treatment increased for ACTH from $3718 in 2006 to $100 457 in 2020, ~2700% (by a factor of 27), whereas it decreased for oral prednisolone from $169 in 2006 to $89 in 2020, ~50% (by a factor of 0.5), and increased for vigabatrin from $1206 in 2009 (first year with data on vigabatrin used for IESS) to $4102 in 2020, ~340% (by a factor of 3.4). During the first 60 days after diagnosis, inpatient admission days and costs where higher for ACTH than for oral prednisolone and vigabatrin-5.0 (3.0-8.3) days vs 2.0 (0.0-5.0) days vs 2.0 (0.0-6.0) days, p < .0001; and $32 828 ($14 711-$67 216) vs $16 227 ($0-$35 829) vs $17 844 ($0-$47 642), p < .0001. ACTH use decreased from representing 78% of first-line treatments in 2006 to 18% in 2020 (p < .0001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. SIGNIFICANCE: The gap between the cost of ACTH and the cost of oral prednisolone or vigabatrin has widened markedly from 2006 to 2020, whereas the relative proportion of ACTH use has decreased.

Health care resource utilization and costs before and after epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics of epilepsy surgery utilization and its impact on health care resource use. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study using the MarketScan commercial claims database. We studied children and adults who underwent epilepsy surgery in the USA in the period 2006-2019. Our main outcome was health care resource utilization. RESULTS: Among the 87,368 patients with refractory epilepsy, 2,011 (2.3%) patients underwent resective epilepsy surgery, 188 (0.2%) patients underwent partial or total hemispherectomy, and 183 (0.2%) patients underwent corpus callosotomy. The proportion of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery has barely increased in the period 2006 to 2019. The year of resective epilepsy surgery was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [median (p25-p75): $140,322 ($88,749-$225,862)], but healthcare costs per person-year substantially decreased in the 5 years after compared to the 5 years before the year of resective epilepsy surgery [$7,691 ($2,738-$22,092) versus $18,750 ($7,361-$47,082), p-value < 0.0001]. This result held in all resective epilepsy surgery subgroups: children, adults, temporal, extratemporal, subdural EEG monitoring, stereoEEG monitoring, and no intracranial monitoring. Similarly, the year of hemispherectomy was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [$260,983 ($154,791-$453,986)], but healthcare costs per person-year substantially decreased in the 5 years after compared to the 5 years before the year of hemispherectomy [$26,834 ($12,842-$52,627) versus $54,596 ($19,547-$136,412), p-value < 0.0001]. In contrast, the year of corpus callosotomy was associated with high healthcare costs per person-year [$162,399 ($108,150-$253,156)], but healthcare costs per person-year did not substantially decrease in the 5 years after than in the 5 years before the year of corpus callosotomy [$25,464 ($10,764-$69,338) versus $36,221 ($12,841-$85,747), p-value = 0.2142]. CONCLUSION: In privately insured patients in the USA, resective epilepsy surgery and hemispherectomy substantially decrease healthcare utilization in subsequent years. Epilepsy surgery may help contain costs in the field of epilepsy.

Factors associated with long-term outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe long-term clinical and developmental outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and identify factors associated with new neurological deficits after RSE. METHODS: We performed retrospective analyses of prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020 on pediatric patients with RSE. We analyzed clinical outcomes from at least 30 days after RSE and, in a subanalysis, we assessed developmental outcomes and evaluated risk factors in previously normally developed patients. RESULTS: Follow-up data on outcomes were available in 276 patients (56.5% males). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up duration was 1.6 (.9-2.7) years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4% (16/403 patients), and 15 (5.4%) patients had died after hospital discharge. One hundred sixty-six (62.9%) patients had subsequent unprovoked seizures, and 44 (16.9%) patients had a repeated RSE episode. Among 116 patients with normal development before RSE, 42 of 107 (39.3%) patients with available data had new neurological deficits (cognitive, behavioral, or motor). Patients with new deficits had longer median (IQR) electroclinical RSE duration than patients without new deficits (10.3 [2.1-134.5] h vs. 4 [1.6-16] h, p = .011, adjusted odds ratio = 1.003, 95% confidence interval = 1.0008-1.0069, p = .027). The proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≥ 4) was 22 of 90 (24.4%), and they were more likely to have received a continuous infusion. SIGNIFICANCE: About one third of patients without prior epilepsy developed recurrent unprovoked seizures after the RSE episode. In previously normally developing patients, 39% presented with new deficits during follow-up, with longer electroclinical RSE duration as a predictor.

Convolutional neural networks to identify malformations of cortical development: A feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a deep learning model to automatically detect malformations of cortical development (MCD). METHODS: We trained a deep learning model to distinguish between diffuse cortical malformation (CM), periventricular nodular heterotopia (PVNH), and normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We trained 4 different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. We used batch normalization, global average pooling, dropout layers, transfer learning, and data augmentation to minimize overfitting. RESULTS: There were 45 subjects (866 images) with a normal MRI, 52 subjects (790 images) with CM, and 32 subjects (750 images) with PVNH. There was no subject overlap between the training, validation, and test sets. The InceptionResNetV2 architecture performed best in the validation set in all models and was evaluated in the test set with the following results: 1) the model distinguishing between CM and normal MRI yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 and accuracy of 0.81; 2) the model distinguishing between PVNH and normal MRI yielded an AUC of 0.90 and accuracy of 0.84; 3) the model distinguishing between the three classes (CM, PVNH, and normal MRI) yielded an AUC of 0.88 and accuracy of 0.74. Visualization with gradient-weighted class activation maps and saliency maps showed that the deep learning models classified images based on relevant areas within each image. SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed that CNNs can detect MCD at a clinically useful performance level with a fully automated workflow without image feature selection.

Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus population by describing treatment variability in super-refractory status epilepticus patients and comparing relevant clinical characteristics, including outcomes, between super-refractory status epilepticus, and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data between June 2011 and January 2019. SETTING: Seventeen academic hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: We included patients 1 month to 21 years old presenting with convulsive refractory status epilepticus. We defined super-refractory status epilepticus as continuous or intermittent seizures lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours following initiation of continuous infusion and divided the cohort into super-refractory status epilepticus and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus groups. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 281 patients (157 males) with a median age of 4.1 years (1.3-9.5 yr), including 31 super-refractory status epilepticus patients. Compared with nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus group, super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of first nonbenzodiazepine-antiseizure medication (149 min [55-491.5 min] vs 62 min [33.3-120.8 min]; p = 0.030) and of continuous infusion (495 min [177.5-1,255 min] vs 150 min [90-318.5 min]; p = 0.003); prolonged seizure duration (120 hr [58-368 hr] vs 3 hr [1.4-5.9 hr]; p < 0.001) and length of ICU stay (17 d [9.5-40 d] vs [1.8-8.8 d]; p < 0.001); more medical complications (18/31 [58.1%] vs 55/250 [22.2%] patients; p < 0.001); lower return to baseline function (7/31 [22.6%] vs 182/250 [73.4%] patients; p < 0.001); and higher mortality (4/31 [12.9%] vs 5/250 [2%]; p = 0.010). Within the super-refractory status epilepticus group, status epilepticus resolution was attained with a single continuous infusion in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%), two in 10 of 31 (32.3%), and three or more in six of 31 (19.4%). Most super-refractory status epilepticus patients (30/31, 96.8%) received midazolam as first choice. About 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) received additional treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure medication treatment, higher number of medical complications and mortality, and lower return to neurologic baseline than nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients, although these associations were not adjusted for potential confounders. Treatment approaches following the first continuous infusion were heterogeneous, reflecting limited information to guide clinical decision-making in super-refractory status epilepticus.

Clinical presentation of new onset refractory status epilepticus in children (the pSERG cohort).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the clinical profile and outcomes of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in children, and investigated the relationship between fever onset and status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: Patients with refractory SE (RSE) between June 1, 2011 and October 1, 2016 were prospectively enrolled in the pSERG (Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group) cohort. Cases meeting the definition of NORSE were classified as "NORSE of known etiology" or "NORSE of unknown etiology." Subgroup analysis of NORSE of unknown etiology was completed based on the presence and time of fever occurrence relative to RSE onset: fever at onset (≤24 h), previous fever (2 weeks-24 h), and without fever. RESULTS: Of 279 patients with RSE, 46 patients met the criteria for NORSE. The median age was 2.4 years, and 25 (54%) were female. Forty (87%) patients had NORSE of unknown etiology. Nineteen (48%) presented with fever at SE onset, 16 (40%) had a previous fever, and five (12%) had no fever. The patients with preceding fever had more prolonged SE and worse outcomes, and 25% recovered baseline neurological function. The patients with fever at onset were younger and had shorter SE episodes, and 89% recovered baseline function. SIGNIFICANCE: Among pediatric patients with RSE, 16% met diagnostic criteria for NORSE, including the subcategory of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Pediatric NORSE cases may also overlap with refractory febrile SE (FSE). FIRES occurs more frequently in older children, the course is usually prolonged, and outcomes are worse, as compared to refractory FSE. Fever occurring more than 24 h before the onset of seizures differentiates a subgroup of NORSE patients with distinctive clinical characteristics and worse outcomes.

Time to Treatment in Pediatric Convulsive Refractory Status Epilepticus: The Weekend Effect.

BACKGROUND: Time to treatment in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is delayed. We aimed to evaluate the influence of weekends and holidays on time to treatment of this pediatric emergency. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data of pediatric patients with refractory status epilepticus. RESULTS: We included 329 patients (56% males) with a median (p25 to p75) age of 3.8 (1.3 to 9) years. The median (p25 to p75) time to first BZD on weekdays and weekends/holidays was 20 (6.8 to 48.3) minutes versus 11 (5 to 35) minutes, P = 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 1.55), P = 0.12. The time to first non-BZD ASM was longer on weekdays than on weekends/holidays (68 [42.8 to 153.5] minutes versus 59 [27 to 120] minutes, P = 0.006; adjusted HR = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.08 to 1.76], P = 0.009). However, this difference was mainly driven by status epilepticus with in-hospital onset: among 108 patients, the time to first non-BZD ASM was longer during weekdays than during weekends/holidays (55.5 [28.8 to 103.5] minutes versus 28 [15.8 to 66.3] minutes, P = 0.003; adjusted HR = 1.65 [95% CI: 1.08 to 2.51], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The time to first non-BZD ASM in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is shorter on weekends/holidays than on weekdays, mainly driven by in-hospital onset status epilepticus. Data on what might be causing this difference may help tailor policies to improve medication application timing.

Descriptive epidemiology and health resource utilization for status epilepticus in the emergency department in the United States of America.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology and health resource utilization for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Primary SE and secondary SE (SE in a case who visited the ED for other primary reason) were compared with non-SE seizures. Secondary SE is expected to have worse outcomes and higher costs because of another primary cause for ED visit. RESULTS: In the period 2010-2014, there were 149,750 ED visits with primary SE; 83,459 ED with secondary SE; and 5,359,103 ED visits with non-SE seizures. On multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of hospital admission were 7 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 5 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; the odds of transfer to another hospital were 9 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 3 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; the odds of death were 2.5 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 12 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; and the charges (in January 2020 USA dollars) were $9000 higher in primary SE than in non-SE seizures, and $35,000 higher in secondary SE than in non-SE seizures. CONCLUSION: Among all reasons for ED visits, SE, and in particular, secondary SE, are among the most resource-consuming conditions, being much more expensive than non-SE seizures in the ED.

Cost-effectiveness of adrenocorticotropic hormone versus oral steroids for infantile spasms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and oral steroids as first-line treatment for infantile spasm resolution, we performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness study. METHODS: A decision analysis model was populated with effectiveness data from a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature and cost data from publicly available prices. Effectiveness was defined as the probability of clinical spasm resolution 14 days after treatment initiation. RESULTS: We included 21 studies with a total of 968 patients. The effectiveness of ACTH was not statistically significantly different from that of oral steroids (.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .60-.79 vs. .63, 95% CI = .56-.70; p = .28). Considering only the three available randomized trials with a total of 185 patients, the odds ratio of spasm resolution at 14 days with ACTH compared to high-dose prednisolone (4-8 mg/kg/day) was .92 (95% CI = .34-2.52, p = .87). Adjusting for potential publication bias, estimates became even more favorable to high-dose prednisolone. Using US prices, the more cost-effective treatment was high-dose prednisolone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $333 per case of spasms resolved, followed by ACTH, with an ICER of $1 432 200 per case of spasms resolved. These results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses and different assumptions. Prednisolone at 4-8 mg/kg/day was more cost-effective than ACTH under a wide range of assumptions. SIGNIFICANCE: For infantile spasm resolution 2 weeks after treatment initiation, current evidence does not support the preeminence of ACTH in terms of effectiveness and, especially, cost-effectiveness.

Status Epilepticus-Work-Up and Management in Children.

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies in children and has a mortality of 2 to 4%. Admissions for SE are very resource-consuming, especially in refractory and super-refractory SE. An increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SE leaves room for improving SE treatment protocols, including medication choice and timing. Selecting the most efficacious medications and giving them in a timely manner may improve outcomes. Benzodiazepines are commonly used as first line and they can be used in the prehospital setting, where most SE episodes begin. The diagnostic work-up should start simultaneously to initial treatment, or as soon as possible, to detect potentially treatable causes of SE. Although most etiologies are recognized after the first evaluation, the detection of more unusual causes may become challenging in selected cases. SE is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt and efficacious treatment may improve outcomes. We provide a summary of existing evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the work-up and treatment of SE in pediatric patients.

The burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: Treatments for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) have a wide range of effectiveness. The estimated effectiveness of non-intravenous benzodiazepines (non-IV BZDs) ranges from approximately 70% to 90% and the estimated effectiveness of non-benzodiazepine antiseizure medications (non-BZD ASMs) ranges from approximately 50% to 80%. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of SE. METHODS: We performed a decision analysis that evaluates how decisional uncertainty on treatment choices for SE impacts hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and costs in the United States. We evaluated treatment effectiveness based on the available literature. RESULTS: Use of a non-IV BZD with high estimated effectiveness, like intranasal midazolam, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like rectal diazepam, would result in a median (p25 -p75 ) reduction in hospital admissions from 6 (3.9-8.8) to 1.1 (0.7-1.8) per 100 cases and associated cost reductions of $638 ($289-$1064) per pediatric patient and $1107 ($972-$1281) per adult patient. For BZD-resistant SE, use of a non-BZD ASM with high estimated effectiveness, like phenobarbital, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like phenytoin/fosphenytoin, would result in a reduction in ICU admissions from 9.1 (7.3-11.2) to 3.9 (2.6-5.5) per 100 cases and associated cost reduction of $1261 ($445-$2223) per pediatric patient and $319 ($-93-$806) per adult patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that relatively minor improvements in effectiveness may lead to substantial reductions in downstream hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs. SIGNIFICANCE: Decreasing decisional uncertainty and using the most effective treatments for SE may substantially decrease hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs.

Association of guideline publication and delays to treatment in pediatric status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment shortens time to treatment in pediatric refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE), we compared time to treatment before (2011-2014) and after (2015-2019) publication of evidence of delays in treatment of rSE in the Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group (pSERG) as assessed by patient interviews and record review. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset from June 2011 to September 2019 on pediatric patients (1 month-21 years of age) with rSE. RESULTS: We studied 328 patients (56% male) with median (25th-75th percentile [p25-p75]) age of 3.8 (1.3-9.4) years. There were no differences in the median (p25-p75) time to first benzodiazepine (BZD) (20 [5-52.5] vs 15 [5-38] minutes, p = 0.3919), time to first non-BZD antiseizure medication (68 [34.5-163.5] vs 65 [33-142] minutes, p = 0.7328), and time to first continuous infusion (186 [124.2-571] vs 160 [89.5-495] minutes, p = 0.2236). Among 157 patients with out-of-hospital onset whose time to hospital arrival was available, the proportion who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival increased after publication of evidence of delays (41 of 81 [50.6%] vs 57 of 76 [75%], p = 0.0018), and the odds ratio (OR) was also increased in multivariable logistic regression (OR 4.35 [95% confidence interval 1.96-10.3], p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: Publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment was not associated with improvements in time to treatment of rSE, although it was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival.

Retrospective observational study on hospital readmission for status epilepticus in the United States over 2016.

OBJECTIVE: Describe hospital readmission for status epilepticus (SE) in the United States, and study potential risk factors for readmission. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's 2016 Nationwide Readmissions Database. We studied patients of all ages admitted to the hospital due to SE. RESULTS: We included 32 327  patients admitted for SE in 2016. 8.4% of these patients were readmitted for SE at least one more time within 2016 (cross-sectional analysis). The incidence rate was 18 readmissions for SE per 1000 patient-months. Among the survivors of the index admission for SE who had at least 6 months of follow-up within this database (16 043  patients), the cumulative probability of having a readmission for SE at 1, 3, and 6 months from the index admission was approximately 3.5%, 7.5%, and 11%, respectively (time-to-event analysis). Patients with refractory epilepsy were more likely to have a readmission for SE compared to patients without refractory epilepsy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.82, adjusted P =.0006), and pediatric patients were more likely to have a readmission for SE compared to adult patients (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.26-1.87, adjusted P = .0003) during 6-month follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: Hospital readmissions for SE in the United States are frequent. Independent factors associated with readmission in this database were refractory epilepsy and pediatric age.

Deep learning in rare disease. Detection of tubers in tuberous sclerosis complex.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a deep learning algorithm to automatically detect cortical tubers in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to explore the utility of deep learning in rare disorders with limited data, and to generate an open-access deep learning standalone application. METHODS: T2 and FLAIR axial images with and without tubers were extracted from MRIs of patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and controls, respectively. We trained three different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures on a training dataset and selected the one with the lowest binary cross-entropy loss in the validation dataset, which was evaluated on the testing dataset. We visualized image regions most relevant for classification with gradient-weighted class activation maps (Grad-CAM) and saliency maps. RESULTS: 114 patients with TSC and 114 controls were divided into a training set, a validation set, and a testing set. The InceptionV3 CNN architecture performed best in the validation set and was evaluated in the testing set with the following results: sensitivity: 0.95, specificity: 0.95, positive predictive value: 0.94, negative predictive value: 0.95, F1-score: 0.95, accuracy: 0.95, and area under the curve: 0.99. Grad-CAM and saliency maps showed that tubers resided in regions most relevant for image classification within each image. A stand-alone trained deep learning App was able to classify images using local computers with various operating systems. CONCLUSION: This study shows that deep learning algorithms are able to detect tubers in selected MRI images, and deep learning can be prudently applied clinically to manually selected data in a rare neurological disorder.